So what’s a person who’s ready to call it quits at the office to do? Relocating to more affordable climes is one option.
Personal finance website WalletHub has ranked 182 U.S. cities by retiree-friendliness as part of its 2019′s Best & Worst Places to Retire report. The study compared the cities across 46 key metrics, ranging from cost of living and quality of local health care to retired taxpayer-friendliness, crime rates and availability of recreational activities.
Roughly speaking, the top cities for retirees tended to be located in Southeastern or Mountain states, while those ranking last seemed to be clustered in California and the Northeast. The latter regions tend to have higher housing costs and taxes, which can impact seniors living on fixed incomes more severely.
Some key findings about the cities surveyed included:
- Most seniors: Pearl City, Hawaii, boasts the highest share of the population age 65 and older, 23.3% — 3.2 times higher than Fontana, California, the city with the lowest such share at 7.2%.
- Lowest cost of living: Laredo, Texas, has the lowest adjusted cost-of-living index for retirees, 76.28, which is 2.6 times lower than San Francisco, the highest at 195.49.
- Older workers: Juneau, Alaska, has the highest share of workers aged 65-plus, 28.08% — 2.8 times higher than bottom-ranked Detroit, with 10.11%.
- Home health care: St. Louis has the mosthome health-care facilities per 100,000 residents, at 49.54, which is 25.7 times more than Fontana, at 1.93.
Here are the top five best cities for retirees, followed by the five worst (with No. 1 being worst), according to WalletHub:
The top 5
1. Orlando, Florida
2. Tampa, Florida
3. Scottsdale, Arizona
4. Charleston, South Carolina
The bottom 5
1. Stockton, California
2. Bridgeport, Connecticut
3. Warwick, Rhode Island
4. San Bernardino, California
5. Bakersfield, California
For the full WalletHub report and ranking, along with the methodology used, go to: